In October 2015, I wrote a blog post introducing a new LinkedIn product: ProFinder. LinkedIn ProFinder is an online portal that allows freelance/consulting professionals to be hired on a project-basis for their expertise. I recently had a call with a LinkedIn rep regarding ProFinder and was surprised to learn that the tool will be a passive resource for the Pro (read on to learn more) and that Pros are only accessible when ProFinder is rolled out to their city. Imagine my disappointment on both fronts.
I want my network to know that I am listed as a Pro so they can refer me to other professionals who may need my services. Without having a way to promote this, LinkedIn ProFinder acts as a passive portal. Does that make sense to you? No, me either.
While on the same hand, LinkedIn ProFinder is now accessible to (certain) professionals in San Francisco and New York City, meaning: you can only search for Pros in those two major metropolitan cities. So, even though ProFinder is accessible to consultants in any industry and location (I have created an account/profile), you cannot search for me because I am not located in one of the two currently active territories. Big bummer. The conversation warranted a blog post with feedback for LinkedIn to take into consideration as they iterate and improve this product.
Here are a few gaps or, more positively, areas of opportunity:
My expanded network lives on LinkedIn. Even though the majority of my first degree connections know my area of expertise, the power in my network often lives beyond my immediate network and into those second and third degree connections. People want to connect the dots as quickly as possible and seeing which connections we have in common is a critical component to validating my credibility.
If ProFinder does get integrated with LinkedIn, I can tell you where I hope it does not go: in the drop down menu when I hover over my profile picture in the top right corner. I already have eight other areas to dive into from that menu. Please, LinkedIn, do not lose my engagement by hiding another item in that menu.
When a Pro fills out their questionnaire to join the marketplace he or she will indicate their length of experience in the said-service he or she is providing. Frankly, this could help replace the budget piece too. Wouldn’t you assume that someone who has more experience is going to cost more? I would.
Take a look again at the screenshot. It looks just like my LinkedIn profile, doesn’t it? This is a big disconnect for me. Why would I need another website link with my LinkedIn profile populated, when I can just go directly to LinkedIn.com instead? Nix it.
Here are just six considerations for LinkedIn on ProFinder. This post is not intended to be a rant, but a dialogue of recommendations to improve ProFinder for its users.
This post will be shared with LinkedIn’s CEO, Jeff Weiner, and VP of User Experience, Steve Johnson. Another team I am working with (SocialSalesGPS – Brynne Tillman, Colleen McKenna, Michael de Groot, Beth Granger, Ted Prodromou, Bob Woods, Viveka von Rosen and Mario M. Martinez Jr.) initiated conversations with them recently with our feedback for improving LinkedIn. We live it and breathe it every day.
Please share in the comments, the features you would like to see in ProFinder that would improve your experience and likelihood of you using the product. I’m sure this goes without saying, but please keep it positive, professional, and productive.
Content in this post is current as of its publication date: 1/26/16.