By Newt Fowler
January 17, 2013
citybizlist.com
How many of us view the success of our LinkedIn activity as measured by the number of connections? That on line networking revolves around accepting essentially all connection requests? And if we do reach out to the network we have assembled on line, is our only action to ambush a connection on rare occasion for an introduction to make a sale? Why is our on line networking behavior so different from how we behave in person? Why do we ignore the social rules that apply when we’re meeting the carbon based version of the same people? I recently sat down with Colleen McKenna, Principal of Intero Advisory to figure out whether we should even care.
I viewed LinkedIn as an afterthought that I rarely get to. I didn’t realize that there is a fundamentally better way to design our networks no matter what our objectives. The irony is that we may be able to network to better result than relying entirely on the rubber chicken circuit. Should I continue to go to events, hoping to have a promising conversation and collect the right card, or should I design my on line network to accomplish a better result with less effort and more direction?
To spend our professional lives building our reputations, to hope in any initial conversation to have imparted some sense of who we are, yet to struggle in the moment of first encounter to get that message across, there’s a better path, one we can control and shape. Others gain insight on who we are – our brand – increasingly on line. We use our networks to guide us to someone who can help meet a need and if you’re unknown within that network, it’s as if you don’t exist. Irrespective of whether we embrace networks like LinkedIn, the reality is that it’s up to us to design not only our brand but how we cultivate our professional networks to extend who we are to the people we want to know.
Colleen started with what LinkedIn isn’t. “One should never sell on LinkedIn.” She continued, “it’s a point of entry, a place to begin a conversation.” What Colleen got me thinking about is how on line professional networks differ little from our carbon based world. If one views their effort at networking as developing one’s professional “brand”, then the focus of our activity on LinkedIn isn’t any different. It isn’t about the sale; it’s about defining who we are as professionals and making a meaningful connection. But here’s what LinkedIn can be:
We all sense the sea change as people increasingly check us out on line – but beyond the Google search lies how they use their network to gain a qualitative element to their understanding of us. In many ways our network guides us to our initial sense of who we should use to meet a need. No website, business card or ad has the same impact. Colleen suspects that LinkedIn has a greater end game – to help us organize our lives so our networks are central. The battle over who owns our networks was fought within outlook and our corporate in box, but the reality is that we’re moving our professional world outside of our company’s control. Whether any company wants to admit it, there is a new reality – LinkedIn is heading to a CRM that is not fenced inside a company based on their rules, but is designed by each of us based on relationships our employers no longer can control. The battle over the rolodex is over. The opportunity for employers is to realize that the value they offer to an employee is not based on fighting over control of their network, but to enable employees to develop a powerful and engaged network for that employee to put to use for their organization.
To learn more about Colleen’s work at Intero Advisory: www.interoadvisory.com
For comments about this column or thoughts on future conversations, let me know at: nfowler@rosenbergmartin.com
With more than 28 years experience in law and business, Newt Fowler loves advising many of the Greater Baltimore region’s entrepreneurs and technology companies, guiding them through all aspects of business planning, technology commercialization, and M&A and financing transactions. He serves on the Boards of the Innovation Alliance and TEDCO.